A crucial goal under the One Planet – One Health initiative is to ensure the careful and limited application of antibiotics in livestock farming to address the worldwide issue of antimicrobial resistance. The continuous use of antibiotics in large livestock operations endangers treatment efficiency by promoting the emergence and selection of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains and their excretion into the environment.
Discharge of active antimicrobial agents through manure and agricultural drainage into the environment exacerbates the overall distribution of antibiotic-resistant pathogens (see Figure 1).
The results presented in this table can be summarised as follows:
1. Longevity – In this study a comparison was made for two cases, AHV vs NON-AHV treated animals. A total of 64,467 animals were part of the study. Significant differences were observed between these two groups, with an exceptionally low p-value (orders of magnitude lower than p ≤ 0.001). For dairy farmers, this implies that cows treated with AHV products extended the mean culling age by 0.71 years compared to cows that did not receive AHV products. The increase in longevity is an indicator of improved animal health and welfare, providing substantial economic benefits for the farmer.
2. Milk yield – To determine the relationship between somatic cell count (SCC) and ISK (milk yield), a spearman-rank correlation coefficient test was performed. Again, the overall objective was to compare AHV treated animals with non-AHV treated reference animals. A somatic cell count exceeding 200,000 cells/mL was considered as an indicator for mastitis. Results show a statistically significant difference with a p-value of less than 0.05. The AHV group demonstrated a smaller reduction in milk yield as cell count increased, indicating a weaker correlation between cell count and milk production in the group and a higher resilience to subclinical mastitis.
3. Milk prediction – The machine learning algorithm GBS was applied in an attempt to predict milk yields for 3 different dairy companies. While the gradient boosting technique applied is not compatible with a test for statistical significance, the results demonstrate that the GBS model was making highly accurate predictions. In the validation set, the largest error in milk yield prediction was less than 2.5%. The model showed that the on-farm use of AHV products such as Quick and Extra improved the milk yield on all three farms included in this first trial.
AHV develops natural herbal remedies aimed at enhancing animal health and productivity, subsequently decreasing antibiotic use on farms. To illustrate the positive health impact, sophisticated statistical models were employed to compare data from large animal populations. The continuous use of antibiotics in large livestock operations endangers treatment efficiency by promoting the emergence and selection of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains and their excretion into the environment.